As I reviewed my article once again (link on previous post), I realized I found it is well-written, indeed. I found it to be very clear and interesting. It gave enough detail into the topic at hand to inform the reader without boring him or her. It was concise and to the point, touching on most potential questions the audience might have about the topic, which was the new education curriculum offered to students in different languages.
One thing that this article did particularly well on was showing, not telling the audience what this different approach to education is. The author resorted to quoting students and school staff about the programs in order to show why these students are interested in this program, or what they find appealing about what they are doing within the program.
This article was more informative than anything else. It proved to have reliable sources, including a participating school's principal as well as the administrative director of the MDPS division of bilingual education and world languages, Joanne Urrutia.
I liked this lesson because it gave me a chance to judge a piece for myself, and then I was able to go back and view the same article with new lessons learned in the classroom.
No comments:
Post a Comment